About your Search

20130416
20130424
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
red marker on bob's finger. >> dana: guilty. >> got to go. >> see you tomorrow, everybody. >> bret: lies, misinformation and a deliberate coverup. conclusions of house republicans on how the obama administration handled the benghazi terror attack. democrats in the white house are firing back. this is "special report." >> good evening, i'm bret bamplet as a new terror investigation is underway in boston, researchers for five republican controlled house committees have come out with a scathing indictment of the obama administration's response to the september 11th terror attack in benghazi, libya that left four americans dead. including the u.s. ambassador. national security correspondent jennifer griffin has details tonight from the pentagon. good evening, jennifer. >> greenk, bret. fox news has obtained a progress report prepared by members of the house republican conference on events surrounding the september 11th attacks in benghazi. it concludes the administration's reaction was, quote: a concerted attempt to insulate the department of state from blame following the terrorist a
documents to submit to the record, without objection, one from the former representative bob barr, one of administrative policy. those who oppose the bill. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. polis: i have a letter from several technology companies and others who oppose the bill i'd like to submit to the record. developments over the last year makes this approach even more questionable, end quothe. former representative bob barr, congress takes the civil liberties created by this bill just as seriously as it takes cyberthreats the bill purports to address, end quote. mr. speaker, we should not hurt the internet to save the internet, and this bill in its current form leaves the language wide open with the turn to potential abuse. when we talk about bodily harm, that includes dog bites. essentially anything is included in this information without limitation with regard to how the government can use it. this is a back door attack on the fourth amendment against unreasonable search and seize your -- seizures. we have processees on how information can and cannot be used. this is
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2